Specialized Returns and Taxpayers · Retirement plans
Plans for self-employed persons (e.g., SEP and SIMPLE)
tax year · reviewed 2026-08-21 · Draft for I. Ohu review
Both plans exist because a small employer will not run a 401(k), and both are built on individual retirement accounts rather than a trust. That is where the similarity ends. A SEP takes only employer money and the employee has no election at all; a SIMPLE is built on the employee’s salary reduction election and the employer’s obligation to match it. Every eligibility, timing and ceiling difference follows from that one fact.
The rule
Who must be covered in a SEP (IRC § 408(k)(2)). a simplified employee pension satisfies the participation requirement for a year only if the employer contributes for each employee who has attained age 21, has performed service for the employer during at least 3 of the immediately preceding 5 years, and received at least the indexed compensation amount from the employer for the year; employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement and non-resident aliens without US-source income may be excluded (IRC § 408(k)(2))TY2026 the IRC § 408(k)(2)(C) compensation threshold for SEP participation is $800 for 2026, up from $750; the statutory figure is $450, indexedTY2026 The three-of-five test counts any service in a year, not a full year of service, so a seasonal worker who appears for three consecutive summers has satisfied it.
How much, and to whom. contributions must not discriminate in favour of highly compensated employees, and are considered discriminatory unless they bear a uniform relationship to the compensation of each participating employee, subject to the permitted disparity rules of IRC § 401(l)(2) (IRC § 408(k)(3))TY2026 the employer contribution to a SEP is bounded by the IRC § 415(c)(1) annual additions limit — the lesser of the dollar limit for the year or 100 percent of the participant’s compensation — and by the IRC § 404(h) deduction ceiling of 25 percent of compensation, with compensation itself capped at the IRC § 401(a)(17) amountTY2026 The employee makes no contribution and has no election. There is no salary reduction in a SEP, so an employee who wants to save more must use a separate IRA of their own.
Vesting in a SEP is not a schedule. a SEP qualifies only if employer contributions are not conditioned on retaining any part of the amount contributed and the employer imposes no prohibition on withdrawals — which is what makes a SEP immediately and fully vested (IRC § 408(k)(4))TY2026 Because the money goes into the employee’s own IRA and the employer may not restrict withdrawals, vesting is immediate as a structural matter rather than as a plan term.
Who may sponsor a SIMPLE. an eligible employer for SIMPLE purposes is one that had no more than 100 employees receiving at least $5,000 of compensation for the preceding year; an employer that establishes a plan and later fails the test is treated as eligible for the 2 following years, except where the failure arises from an acquisition, disposition or similar transaction (IRC § 408(p)(2)(C)(i))TY2026 a salary reduction arrangement is not qualified for a year if the employer or a predecessor maintained a qualified plan under which contributions were made or benefits accrued for service in that year (IRC § 408(p)(2)(D))TY2026
Who must be covered in a SIMPLE. all employees who received at least $5,000 in compensation from the employer during any 2 preceding years and are reasonably expected to receive at least $5,000 during the year must be eligible to make the salary reduction election or receive the nonelective contribution; employees described in IRC § 410(b)(3) may be excluded (IRC § 408(p)(4))TY2026 Note how different this is from the SEP test: two preceding years at the statutory dollar floor and a reasonable expectation for the current year, against three of five years at a much lower indexed amount and an age floor.
The employer’s obligation. the employer must match elective contributions up to the applicable percentage of compensation for the year, which is 3 percent; an employer may elect a lower percentage of not less than 1 percent, but not if that would make the percentage lower than 3 in more than 2 years of the 5-year period ending with that year. For an employer with more than 25 employees receiving at least $5,000 of compensation in the preceding year that makes the IRC § 408(p)(2)(E)(i)(II) election, the applicable percentage is 4 percent (IRC § 408(p)(2)(A)(iii), (C)(ii))TY2026 in lieu of matching, the employer may elect to make nonelective contributions of 2 percent of compensation for each employee eligible to participate who has at least $5,000 of compensation for the year, notifying employees within a reasonable period before the 60-day election period; compensation for this purpose is capped at the IRC § 401(a)(17) amount (IRC § 408(p)(2)(B))TY2026 The difference in mechanics matters. The match is dollar for dollar on what the employee actually defers and stops at the applicable percentage; the nonelective contribution goes to every eligible employee whether they defer or not.
And an optional extra. the employer may in addition make nonelective contributions of a uniform percentage of up to 10 percent of compensation for each eligible employee with at least $5,000 of compensation for the year, capped at $5,000 per employee for the year (IRC § 408(p)(2)(A)(iv))TY2026
Employee limits. the IRC § 408(p)(2)(E)(i)(III) limit on salary reduction contributions to a SIMPLE IRA or elective contributions under a SIMPLE 401(k) is $17,000 for 2026, up from $16,500; the higher limit at IRC § 408(p)(2)(E)(i)(I) or (II) is $18,100, up from $17,600TY2026 the IRC § 414(v)(2)(B)(ii) catch-up limit for a SIMPLE 401(k) or SIMPLE IRA, for individuals aged 50 or over, is $4,000 for 2026, up from $3,500; the IRC § 414(v)(2)(E)(ii) age 60 to 63 catch-up for those plans remains $5,250 and the IRC § 414(v)(2)(B)(iii) limit for certain such accounts remains $3,850TY2026
Vesting and timing. an employee’s rights to any contribution to a SIMPLE retirement account are nonforfeitable, with rules similar to the SEP withdrawal rules applying (IRC § 408(p)(3))TY2026 elective contributions must reach the account no later than the close of the 30-day period following the last day of the month for which they are made, and matching or nonelective contributions by the IRC § 404(m)(2)(B) date; an employee may terminate participation at any time and each eligible employee may elect or modify during the 60-day period before the beginning of the year, or before first becoming eligible (IRC § 408(p)(5))TY2026
The SIMPLE 401(k). a SIMPLE 401(k) meets the IRC § 401(k)(3)(A)(ii) nondiscrimination requirement if it satisfies the same contribution pattern — elective contributions up to the SIMPLE limit, a required match up to 3 percent or an elected 2 percent nonelective contribution, and the optional additional nonelective contribution — together with the exclusive plan requirement and the IRC § 408(p)(3) vesting requirement (IRC § 401(k)(11))TY2026 It carries the same contribution pattern and the same immediate vesting, but it is a qualified plan, so it files a Form 5500 where the SIMPLE IRA files nothing.
For the self-employed person, compensation is the hard part. compensation for SIMPLE purposes means the amounts in IRC § 6051(a)(3) and (8), and for a self-employed person means net earnings from self-employment under IRC § 1402(a) determined without regard to the SIMPLE contribution itself; employee includes a self-employed individual within the meaning of IRC § 401(c)(1) (IRC § 408(p)(6))TY2026 earned income for a self-employed participant means net earnings from self-employment under IRC § 1402(a), taken only from a trade or business in which the taxpayer’s personal services are a material income-producing factor, computed with regard to the IRC § 404 deduction itself and with regard to the IRC § 164(f) deduction for half of self-employment tax (IRC § 401(c)(2))TY2026 contributions on behalf of a self-employed individual satisfy the IRC § 162 or § 212 conditions only to the extent they do not exceed that individual’s earned income, determined without regard to the IRC § 404 deduction, from the trade or business with respect to which the plan is established (IRC § 404(a)(8)(C))TY2026 Earned income is computed after the plan contribution and after half the self-employment tax, which makes it circular — the contribution reduces the base on which the contribution is computed.
Current figures
| Item | 2026 |
|---|---|
| SEP eligibility | a simplified employee pension satisfies the participation requirement for a year only if the employer contributes for each employee who has attained age 21, has performed service for the employer during at least 3 of the immediately preceding 5 years, and received at least the indexed compensation amount from the employer for the year; employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement and non-resident aliens without US-source income may be excluded (IRC § 408(k)(2))TY2026 |
| SEP compensation threshold | the IRC § 408(k)(2)(C) compensation threshold for SEP participation is $800 for 2026, up from $750; the statutory figure is $450, indexedTY2026 |
| SEP ceiling | the employer contribution to a SEP is bounded by the IRC § 415(c)(1) annual additions limit — the lesser of the dollar limit for the year or 100 percent of the participant’s compensation — and by the IRC § 404(h) deduction ceiling of 25 percent of compensation, with compensation itself capped at the IRC § 401(a)(17) amountTY2026 |
| SIMPLE eligible employer | an eligible employer for SIMPLE purposes is one that had no more than 100 employees receiving at least $5,000 of compensation for the preceding year; an employer that establishes a plan and later fails the test is treated as eligible for the 2 following years, except where the failure arises from an acquisition, disposition or similar transaction (IRC § 408(p)(2)(C)(i))TY2026 |
| SIMPLE participation | all employees who received at least $5,000 in compensation from the employer during any 2 preceding years and are reasonably expected to receive at least $5,000 during the year must be eligible to make the salary reduction election or receive the nonelective contribution; employees described in IRC § 410(b)(3) may be excluded (IRC § 408(p)(4))TY2026 |
| SIMPLE match | the employer must match elective contributions up to the applicable percentage of compensation for the year, which is 3 percent; an employer may elect a lower percentage of not less than 1 percent, but not if that would make the percentage lower than 3 in more than 2 years of the 5-year period ending with that year. For an employer with more than 25 employees receiving at least $5,000 of compensation in the preceding year that makes the IRC § 408(p)(2)(E)(i)(II) election, the applicable percentage is 4 percent (IRC § 408(p)(2)(A)(iii), (C)(ii))TY2026 |
| SIMPLE nonelective | in lieu of matching, the employer may elect to make nonelective contributions of 2 percent of compensation for each employee eligible to participate who has at least $5,000 of compensation for the year, notifying employees within a reasonable period before the 60-day election period; compensation for this purpose is capped at the IRC § 401(a)(17) amount (IRC § 408(p)(2)(B))TY2026 |
| SIMPLE deferral limit | the IRC § 408(p)(2)(E)(i)(III) limit on salary reduction contributions to a SIMPLE IRA or elective contributions under a SIMPLE 401(k) is $17,000 for 2026, up from $16,500; the higher limit at IRC § 408(p)(2)(E)(i)(I) or (II) is $18,100, up from $17,600TY2026 |
| SIMPLE catch-up | the IRC § 414(v)(2)(B)(ii) catch-up limit for a SIMPLE 401(k) or SIMPLE IRA, for individuals aged 50 or over, is $4,000 for 2026, up from $3,500; the IRC § 414(v)(2)(E)(ii) age 60 to 63 catch-up for those plans remains $5,250 and the IRC § 414(v)(2)(B)(iii) limit for certain such accounts remains $3,850TY2026 |
| Compensation limit | the annual compensation limitation under IRC §§ 401(a)(17), 404(l), 408(k)(3)(C) and 408(k)(6)(D)(ii) is $360,000 for 2026, up from $350,000; for eligible participants in certain governmental plans grandfathered under the plan as in effect on 1 July 1993 it is $535,000, up from $520,000TY2026 |
How it works in practice
Decide first which plan the facts describe, because the two eligibility tests share no elements. A SEP question turns on age 21, three of the last five years, and a small compensation floor. A SIMPLE question turns on the statutory dollar floor in each of two preceding years and a reasonable expectation of the same this year, with no age test at all. Answering a SEP question with the SIMPLE test is the most common error in this area and it is easy to make because both plans feel like “the small employer plan.”
For the employer contribution, be precise about which of the two SIMPLE options is in play. The match is capped at the applicable percentage of compensation and is dollar for dollar within that cap, so an employee deferring less than the percentage gets less than the full amount and an employee deferring more gets no more (IRC § 408(p)(2)(A)(iii)). The nonelective contribution is a flat percentage of compensation paid regardless of the employee’s own deferral, including to employees who defer nothing. Substituting one calculation for the other produces a wrong number every time.
For a SEP maintained by a sole proprietor, do the circular computation properly rather than applying the deduction ceiling to gross self-employment income. Net earnings from self-employment are reduced by half the self-employment tax, and earned income for plan purposes is then reduced by the contribution itself. The practical effect is that the headline SEP percentage for an unincorporated owner works out to a smaller fraction of the pre-contribution figure.
Remember that a SIMPLE must be the employer’s only plan for the year. An employer that already has a 401(k), even a dormant one to which no contributions were made but under which benefits accrued, cannot maintain a SIMPLE for the same year. That single sentence disposes of a surprising number of “which plan should this client adopt” questions.
The seasonal groundskeeper
A landscaping company has maintained a SEP for six years. It employs one full-time office manager and, each summer from May to September, three groundskeepers. One of them, aged 34, has worked every summer for the last four years and earns about $14,000 a season. The owner has never made a SEP contribution for the groundskeepers, reasoning that they are seasonal and not really employees of the business year-round.
The groundskeeper must be covered. IRC § 408(k)(2) asks whether the employee has attained age 21, has performed service for the employer during at least three of the immediately preceding five years, and received at least the threshold compensation for the year. Four summers is service in four of the preceding five years — the statute counts years in which service was performed, not full-time years — and $14,000 is far above the compensation floor. Seasonal status is not an exclusion; the only exclusions IRC § 408(k)(2) recognises are collectively bargained employees and certain non-resident aliens. Because contributions must bear a uniform relationship to compensation, the omission is also a discrimination failure, not merely a shortfall for one person.
Match against nonelective
A design studio with eleven employees sponsors a SIMPLE IRA and has elected the 3 percent match. Of its employees, one earning $80,000 defers 8 percent, one earning $52,000 defers 1 percent, and one earning $61,000 defers nothing. The owner asks what the studio will pay, and then asks what would change under the 2 percent nonelective election.
Under the match, the studio pays 3 percent of $80,000, or $2,400, to the first employee — the match stops at the applicable percentage however much more the employee defers. It pays 1 percent of $52,000, or $520, to the second, because the match is dollar for dollar on what was actually deferred and that is less than the cap. It pays nothing to the third. Total: $2,920. Under the 2 percent nonelective election the studio pays 2 percent of each eligible employee’s compensation regardless of deferral — $1,600, $1,040 and $1,220 respectively, plus the same for every other eligible employee. Total for these three: $3,860. Which is cheaper depends entirely on the participation rate, which is why the election is worth revisiting each year during the notice period.
The consultant's own SEP
An independent consultant with no employees has net profit from Schedule C of $120,000. Her self-employment tax for the year is $16,955, of which half is $8,478 deductible under IRC § 164(f). She wants to make the largest SEP contribution she can and has been told it is “25 percent of $120,000.”
It is not. Earned income under IRC § 401(c)(2) starts from net earnings from self-employment, computed with regard to the IRC § 164(f) deduction and with regard to the IRC § 404 deduction itself. So the base before the contribution is $120,000 less $8,478, or $111,522, and the contribution is 25 percent of that figure reduced by the contribution. Solving the circularity gives 20 percent of $111,522, or $22,304. The IRC § 415(c) annual additions limit is not reached and the compensation cap is not reached, so the answer is driven entirely by the circular computation. A contribution of $30,000 — 25 percent of the Schedule C profit — would exceed the ceiling by a wide margin.
A SEP has no employee contribution and no employee election. Every answer choice offering a salary reduction, an opt-out, or a minimum employee contribution as a condition of SEP participation is wrong. The employee’s only involvement is owning the IRA that receives the money.
The two eligibility tests share nothing. SEP: age 21, three of the last five years, the indexed compensation floor. SIMPLE: the statutory dollar floor in each of two preceding years and a reasonable expectation of the same this year, no age requirement. Answers that import the SEP age test into a SIMPLE question, or the SIMPLE dollar test into a SEP question, are the standard distractors.
Match and nonelective are computed differently, not merely at different rates. The match tracks the employee’s own deferral up to the applicable percentage and pays nothing to a non-deferrer. The nonelective contribution pays every eligible employee the flat percentage whatever they do. Treating it as a match at the lower rate produces the wrong figure for anyone who defers less than that rate or nothing at all.
SIMPLE IRA and SIMPLE 401(k) differ on reporting. They share contribution limits, catch-ups, immediate vesting and the employer contribution structure. The SIMPLE 401(k) is a qualified plan and files the Form 5500 series; the SIMPLE IRA has no annual return. An answer saying “neither has an annual filing requirement” is wrong on the 401(k) side.
How this has changed
SECURE 2.0, Division T of Pub. L. 117-328, reworked the SIMPLE in three ways. It added IRC § 408(p)(2)(A)(iv), letting the employer make an additional uniform nonelective contribution capped both as a percentage of compensation and in dollars per employee, on top of the required match or the flat nonelective election. It added the IRC § 408(p)(2)(E)(i)(II) election under which a larger employer, as the statute defines one, may use higher deferral limits, with the applicable percentage for the match rising from three to four percent for that employer. And it raised the deferral and catch-up limits for smaller employers.
The same Act ended the rule that a SEP or SIMPLE could not accept Roth contributions. Designated Roth treatment is now available for both, which matters because the traditional analysis — deduct now, tax later — is no longer the only shape these plans take.
The compensation figures move annually: both the SEP participation threshold and the SIMPLE deferral limit rose for 2026, and both are set out in the figures above. The statutory dollar figures inside IRC § 408(p) — the eligible employer test, the participation test and the cap on the additional nonelective contribution — are not indexed and have not moved.
Exam focus
Know the two eligibility tests separately and precisely, and know that a SEP is employer-funded only. Expect a question that describes a part-time or seasonal employee and asks whether the employer may exclude them; the answer for a SEP is almost always no.
Know the SIMPLE employer options and how each is computed: a dollar-for-dollar match up to the applicable percentage, or the lower flat nonelective contribution to everyone eligible. Be able to run both calculations on the same facts.
Know that the SIMPLE must be the employer’s only plan for the year, that both SIMPLE forms vest immediately, and that the SIMPLE 401(k) files a Form 5500 while the SIMPLE IRA does not. For a self-employed owner, know that the contribution base is earned income after half the self-employment tax and after the contribution itself.
Check yourself
1. An employer’s SEP covers its three full-time staff. A part-time bookkeeper, aged 45, has worked ten hours a week for the last four years and earned $9,000 last year. Must the employer contribute for her?
Answer: Yes. IRC § 408(k)(2) sets no hours requirement. She is over 21, has performed service in at least three of the immediately preceding five years, and her compensation is far above the threshold. Part-time status is not one of the permitted exclusions, and omitting her would also breach the uniform relationship requirement of IRC § 408(k)(3)(C).
2. A SIMPLE IRA sponsor elects the 3 percent match. An employee earning $50,000 defers 5 percent. What goes into the account for the year?
Answer: $4,000. The employee’s own deferral is 5 percent of $50,000, or $2,500. The match is dollar for dollar on what she defers but stops at 3 percent of compensation, so $1,500. The match does not track the full 5 percent, and it is not reduced because she deferred more than the cap.
3. The same sponsor instead elects the 2 percent nonelective contribution. An employee earning $60,000 defers 1 percent. What goes into the account?
Answer: $1,800. The nonelective contribution is 2 percent of $60,000, or $1,200, paid regardless of what the employee defers, plus her own 1 percent deferral of $600. Note the contrast with the match: under the match this employee would have received only $600 of employer money.
4. An employer has maintained a profit-sharing plan for years, with contributions made for the current year. It now wants to add a SIMPLE IRA for a newly acquired division. May it?
Answer: No. IRC § 408(p)(2)(D) provides that an arrangement is not a qualified salary reduction arrangement for a year if the employer or a predecessor maintained a qualified plan under which contributions were made or benefits accrued for service in that year. The SIMPLE must be the employer’s only plan. The division would have to be brought into the existing plan, or the profit-sharing plan frozen for a full year first.
5. A sole proprietor with $80,000 of Schedule C profit and no employees is told her maximum SEP contribution is $20,000. Is that right?
Answer: No, it is too high. Twenty-five percent of $80,000 is $20,000, but earned income under IRC § 401(c)(2) is computed after the IRC § 164(f) deduction for half of self-employment tax and after the IRC § 404 contribution itself. Reducing the profit by roughly $5,652 of deductible self-employment tax gives about $74,348, and 20 percent of that — the equivalent of 25 percent of the post-contribution figure — is about $14,870.
Change log
- Initial draft. Separates the SEP under IRC § 408(k), which is employer-funded with a three-of-five-years eligibility test and immediate vesting through the withdrawal rule of IRC § 408(k)(4), from the SIMPLE under IRC § 408(p), which is salary-reduction based with a two-preceding-years eligibility test, a required 3 percent match or elected 2 percent nonelective contribution, and the exclusive plan requirement. Carries the 2026 amounts from Notice 2025-67 and the SECURE 2.0 additions at IRC § 408(p)(2)(A)(iv) and the 4 percent applicable percentage for electing larger employers.
Related topics
- Employer and employee contributions 2.3.3.a
- Reporting requirements 2.3.3.b
- Qualified and non-qualified plans 2.3.3.e
- Non-discrimination rules 2.3.3.f
- Prohibited transactions 2.3.3.d